It is difficult to get rid of EMF radiation all together because it is all around us.
ELF EMF radiation is created by anything powered by electricity and RF radiation is created by cell networks and wifi, among other sources.
You can see how it would be extremely difficult to get rid of EMF radiation but you can certainly reduce EMF radiation.
This article will cover:
- Create distance between your cell phone and your body
- Avoid using a cell phone with weak signal
- Not sleeping near common RF sources like cell phones, routers and electrical panels
- Turning off your wireless router at night and when you’re not using it
- Using an EMF shielding device
Further Reading:
- What is EMF? EMFs Explained
- What Does EMF Radiation Mean?
- How Do I Block EMF In My House?
- Do Cell Phones Give Off EMF?
- Are EMF Waves Harmful?
- What Material Can Block EMF
1. Create distance between your cell phone and your body
You can reduce phone radiation in a number of ways:
– Use headphones, airtube headphones, or speakerphone possible to create distance between your phone and head.
– Send text messages instead of making calls
– Keep your phone away from your body when not in use
– Turn off your phone when you’re not using it
– Use an EMF blocking Cell Phone Case (DefenderShield)
– Don’t sleep with or near your phone
– Turn off Wifi and Bluetooth when you can to reduce the amount of RF radiation
– Choose the lowest radiation cell phone you can
– Put your phone in Airplane mode when you can
2. Avoid using a cell phone with weak signal
Researchers at the California Department of Health found that using cell phones in areas with weak reception can result in microwave radiation emissions that are 10,000 times higher than in areas with strong reception.
The study (1) found that when there is a weak signal, the cell phone will put out an increased amount of radiation in an attempt to connect to a cell tower.
Avoid using your cell phone and definitely don’t put it next to your head when you only have a bar or two and it’s trying to connect to a cell tower.
3. Not sleeping near common RF sources like cell phones, routers and electrical panels
When you are not using electronic devices, make sure to turn them off.
This will help to reduce the amount of EMF radiation you are exposed to.
Cover your phone with a pouch made of aluminum foil. It reduces radiations from a battery.
4. Turning off your wireless router at night and when you’re not using it
You can turn off your wifi (Check step by step process to do it) when it’s not in use or when you’re sleeping. It’s good for our health too.
This will help to reduce the amount of RF EMF you’re exposed to.
5. Using an EMF shielding device
An EMF shield works by blocking EMF radiation. It is a device that helps to reduce the amount of EMF radiation that you are exposed to.
A Faraday cage or Faraday shield can be used to block or reduce EMFs.
A Faraday cage is an enclosure formed by conductive material or by a mesh of conductive material. The cage blocks electromagnetic fields by channeling them around the enclosure.
A Faraday cage can be used to attenuate the EMFs emitted by Wifi Routers like this one from Amazon, this can also be used for EMFs from smart meters like this one (Amazon).
A company like DefenderShield produces independently lab tested materials such as their Ultra Armor™ line which is a composite metal material that blocks EMF frequencies up to 90 GHz.
DefenderShield has the best EMF shield products for cell phones, laptops and tablets and can be found here:
Cell Phone Cases (DefenderShield)
Laptop Shields (DefenderShield)
Tablet/iPad Shields (DefenderShield)
EMF Shielding technology can also protect your body from EMFs. Lambs has the highest quality clothing from hats to underwear. Lambs uses technology called WaveStopper™ which uses silver as the conductive material and lines their products with a mesh shield to help block EMF.
They have multiple clothing products in this line:
FAQs on Getting Rid of EMF Radiation:
Does turning off WiFi reduce radiation?
Yes if you turn off Wifi it will reduce the RF EMF radiation.
Wifi uses radio waves to transmit information, and these radio waves fall under a category of electromagnetic radiation called radio frequency (RF) radiation.
All types of EMFs, including radio frequency (RF) radiation, have been shown to have harmful health effects, especially in large doses for long periods of time.
How do I block EMF on my cell phone?
The only way to completely block EMF from your cell phone is to turn it off completely.
Cell phones emit both extremely low frequency (ELF) radiation from the device itself and radiofrequency (RF) radiation from the cellular network and possibly Wifi and Bluetooth as well.
Airplane mode can block the RF radiation as long as you have the settings setup to turn off cellular, Bluetooth and wifi. If any of those three are on you’re still getting RF radiation.
However, even in Airplane mode, if your phone is on, it is emitting ELF radiation.
Use Case: We can make a pouch using aluminum foil. It has potential to block radiation (Know more). There’re a few ways to block emf in house (check).
How can I avoid phone radiation while sleeping?
You can avoid phone radiation while sleeping by turning it off completely.
The next best option is creating distance between yourself and the cell phone to attenuate the radiation.
If neither of those is an option you can use a Cell Phone Case (DefenderShield) to reduce the radiation while sleeping.
How can I reduce WiFi radiation in my home?
You can reduce Wifi radiation in your home in a few ways:
- Turn off Wifi
- Switch to wired internet instead of wireless to reduce RF radiation in your home
- Use a Wifi Router Guard (Amazon.com) that uses a Faraday cage to attenuate or reduce the Wifi RF radiation in your home
Use Anti Radiation Cloths
It’s suggested to wear shoes that resist radiation effectively (in details) because these provide soothing experience to our naked nerve endings. Incase you’re expecting a baby soon, don’t forget to get protected maternity clothing (in details).
Don’t stop relaxing and chilling for radiations. Get trendy protected beanies and hats (in details) and chill.
Does cell phones give off radiation?
Yes a cell phone does give off radiation.
Cell phones give off both ELF radiation as an electronic device that is powered by battery or when plugged in.
Cell phones also give off RF radiation from being connected to the cellular network, Bluetooth and wifi.
What is the harmful level of EMF?
The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (22) recommends maximum exposure limits of magnetic fields of 2000mG but are generally considered for short term exposures.
The ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to RF EMFs range from 100 KHz to 300 GH.
The guidelines also say that people should not be exposed to electric densities in the head, neck, or trunk of greater than 10 milliamperes per meter squared and has a lower limit of exposure of 2 milliamperes per meter squared for sensitive groups like children.
There are no federal restrictions on overall EMF exposure in the US. For tech savvy generation whom laptop is a every day’s companion for, a protective shield is must while working on the laptop for hours. There’re a lot of laptop radiation shields available in the market, we have curated a list for your easy pick.
Wireless devices like cell phones, iPads/tablets and other mobile devices used against the head and body are regulated by the FCC in the US. The FCC has exposure limits in terms of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR).
The SAR limit set by the FCC is 1.6 W/kg maximum:
“The SAR is a value that corresponds to the relative amount of RF energy absorbed in the head of a user of a wireless handset. The FCC limit for public exposure from cellular telephones is an SAR level of 1.6 watts per kilogram (1.6 W/kg).”
– Source: FCC: Cell Phones and Specific Absorption Rate (23)
You can review the Lowest Radiation Cell Phones in this article to read more about SAR and cell phone radiation.
Harmful Effects of EMFs
There is no question about the harmful effects of EMFs above a certain point. We know gamma rays damage cells and DNA. This is the ionizing radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum. (3)
Where the question lies is in the low-mid frequency part of the electromagnetic spectrum, the non-ionizing radiation exposure.
The biological effects of the increasing levels of artificial sources of EMFs is where the research, and this website, are focused.
Ionizing VS Non-Ionizing EMFs Explained
There are two categories of EMFs:
1. Higher frequency – the ionizing radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
This damages cells and DNA directly. Examples are x-rays and gamma rays.
2. Low-mid frequency – the non-ionizing radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
This includes:
- Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF) radiation – major sources are household electronics, nearby power lines and high voltage transmission lines.
- Radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF) radiation – major sources include Wifi, cell phones, and Bluetooth
- Microwave radiation
- Infrared radiation (IR) – absorbed by the skin and eyes as heat. Sources of IR radiation include furnaces and heat lamps
- Visible light radiation
As RF radiation in the form of Wifi, cellular networks (including 5G), and Bluetooth have become increasingly prominent over the last 20-30 years, the scientific community is trying to keep up.
Scientific Literature
As the EMF exposure frequency and duration have increased as technology advances, many researchers, scientists, and doctors have explored the possibility of harmful health effects.
Behavior, Memory and Learning
The behavior of a person and their ability to learn is based on the neural integration of memory, which is a complex system linking the peripheral nervous system and the central nervous system.
This system can be easily affected by things like toxic exposures during fetal development and childhood, nutritional deficiencies, and hormonal imbalance.
We know that chemical toxins like pesticides can be harmful to pregnant women and children, and that ionizing radiation can have adverse effects on development.
Now there is new research linking non-ionizing radiofrequency (RF) radiation from wireless devices to neurological harm, both prenatally and postnatally.
This means that using devices like Wifi, cell phones, tablets, and laptops can potentially damage nerve cells in the hippocampus and other areas of the brain. (3)
A 2021 study published in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health concluded:
“Our results suggest that higher brain exposure to RF-EMF is related to lower non-verbal intelligence…we cannot discard that our results are due to chance finding or reverse causality. Longitudinal studies on RF-EMF brain exposure and cognitive function are needed.” (4)
In an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Pediatrics in 2020, the conclusion was:
“This study found an association between increased screen-based media use, compared with the AAP guidelines, and lower microstructural integrity of brain white matter tracts supporting language and emergent literacy skills in prekindergarten children. The findings suggest further study is needed, particularly during the rapid early stages of brain development.” (5)
There are many available studies on this topic but the final I will highlight is this one from Bioelectromagnetics in 2019.
This study specifically called out the increased exposure to a broad spectrum of radiofrequency (RF) fields from many sources, like mobile phones, Bluetooth and Wifi.
The scientists are trying to fill the gap of research that exists on the low levels of consistent exposure to RF radiation from early prenatal development to young children and the effects on early-life exposure on behavior: emotional, communication and motor skills.
Of course they can’t expose prenatal and postnatal children to increased levels of RF radiation so this study used mice.
They summarize the findings as:
“prenatal and early‐life exposure of male mice to pulsed 1,846 MHz RF fields simulating LTE downlink signals at a whole‐body averaged SAR of 0.5 or 1 W/kg resulted in consistent and long‐lasting changes in drinking and eating behavior, as well as locomotor and rest behaviors” (6)
If you want to read one article on the potential behavioral effects of RF radiation on children, this is the article I would recommend.
Nervous System Effects
The brain and nervous system are very sensitive to microwave radio frequency radiation.
This can cause a lot of problems including damage to parts of the brain that are important for learning and memory, changes in mood, and problems with nerve cell protection. (3)
It is generally thought that children and young adults (up to age 26) are most vulnerable to RF radiation as their brains are most rapidly developing at this age.
A review of recent studies:
In a 2021 study, a cross-section of pre-adolescents ages 9-11 and adolescents ages 17-18 found data that suggested higher brain exposure to RF EMF is related to lower non-verbal intelligence. (7)
A study in the Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy in 2020 used rats to study the effects of 900 MHz (Wifi) of radiation on four different groups: a control group and three exposure groups at different amounts of duration at the 900 MHz frequency.
They found altered neurotransmission in brain cells, cellular degeneration in the radiation-exposed group’s hippocampus and a reduction in working memory. (8)
A 2019 article published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine found:
“900-, 1800-, and 2100-MHz RFR emitted from mobile phones may cause oxidative damage, induce increase in lipid peroxidation, and increase oxidative DNA damage formation in the frontal lobe…” (9)
Reproductive Health Effects
Men generally carry cell phones in their pockets.
The question of the effects of RF radiation on sperm has become a concern.
To help answer these questions several studies have examined the potential effects of non-ionizing radiation on male reproductive health.
A 2018 study was trying to test just this. The authors commented that it is known there are many factors that affect male fertility including high heat, pesticides, ionizing radiation, etc.
With the prevalence of Wifi and cell phones, they wanted to find out if non-ionizing RF radiation could be having an impact as well.
They concluded:
“RF-EMF may induce oxidative stress with an increased level of reactive oxygen species, which may lead to infertility. This has been concluded based on available evidences from in vitro and in vivo studies suggesting that RF-EMF exposure negatively affects sperm quality.” (10)
A 2017 study came to similar conclusions after a 38 year look across multiple countries and continents:
“This comprehensive meta-regression analysis reports a significant decline in sperm counts (as measured by SC and TSC) between 1973 and 2011, driven by a 50–60% decline among men unselected by fertility from North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand.” (11)
Possible Carcinogen
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization works to find causes of cancer.
In 2011 they classified RF EMF radiation as a Group 2B Possible Human Carcinogen (13). Many researchers, scientists and doctors who work in the field of electromagnetic radiation are pushing the IARC to upgrade the risk to a Group 1 Known Carcinogen.
Swedish oncologist and professor Lennart Hardell and scientist in the Department of Oncology at Örebro University Hospital Michael Carlberg published a paper in the International Journal of Oncology.
They state the IARC should classify RF radiation as Group 1 in their conclusion:
“There is clear evidence that RF radiation causes cancer/tumor at multiple sites, primarily in the brain (glioma) and head (acoustic neuroma). There is also evidence of an increased risk of developing other tumor types. The results are similar in both the NTP studies (19,20) and the Ramazzini Institute findings (34). Based on the IARC preamble to the monographs, RF radiation should be classified as Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans.” (12)
Similarly a group of epidemiologists supported the conclusion that the IARC should upgrade the risk to Group 1. (14)
On the topic of 5G the European Parliament published a review of the health impact of 5G (15). The author, Belpoggi, PhD, International Academy of Toxicologic Pathology Fellow (IATPF), reviewed 1,861 studies on cancer (950 human and 911 rodent) and 7,886 studies on reproduction.
In the report she states:
“The literature contains no adequate studies that would rule out the risk that tumours and adverse effects on reproduction and development may occur upon exposure to 5G MMW, or to exclude the possibility of some synergistic interactions between 5G and other frequencies that are already being used. This makes the introduction of 5G fraught with uncertainty concerning both health issues and forecasting and or monitoring the actual exposure of the population: these gaps in knowledge justify the call for a moratorium on MMW of 5G, pending completion of adequate research.” (15)
Biological Mechanisms
DNA and RNA are important molecules that carry our individual genetic codes from one generation to the next.
These fragile chains of nucleic acids not only direct our inheritance, they also direct fetal development, metabolism, protein synthesis, immune system functioning, nervous system functioning and cancer protection.
DNA and RNA can be damaged by exposure to things like ionizing radiation from X-Rays, nuclear power plants and atomic bombs.
The question is if (and how much) non-ionizing radiation from RF EMF sources like cell phones, Wifi, and Bluetooth can alter DNA and RNA by various mechanisms including creation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), similar to other toxins exposures like pesticides and heavy metals.
Several studies have attempted to answer this question.
The National Toxicology tested two common RF frequencies on rodents in a 2 year assay. They found a significant increase in DNA damage in the frontal cortex of male mice (both modulations), leukocytes of female mice (CDMA only), and hippocampus of male rats (CDMA only). (16)
VERUM – Foundation for Behaviour and Environment – based in Munich conducted a 4 year study to parse through the data and try to determine the effects of ELF and RF EMFs on DNA. They concluded that:
“For both ELF-EMF and RF-EMF, the results of the whole genome cDNA micro-array and proteomic analyses indicated that EMF may activate several groups of genes that play a role in cell division, cell proliferation, and cell differentiation.” (17)
Several studies have found DNA damage (19) (20) specifically from radiofrequency radiation, like that from cell phones and wifi.
References
- World Health Organization – Radiation: Electromagnetic Fields
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration – Ionizing Radiation
- Physicians for Safe Technology – Behavior, Memory and Learning: https://mdsafetech.org/science/behavior/
- Cabré-Riera et al. Association between estimated whole-brain radiofrequency electromagnetic fields dose and cognitive function in preadolescents and adolescents. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Jan;231:113659. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113659. Epub 2020 Nov 19. PMID: 33221634.
- Hutton JS, Dudley J, Horowitz-Kraus T, DeWitt T, Holland SK. Associations Between Screen-Based Media Use and Brain White Matter Integrity in Preschool-Aged Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(1)
- Broom KA, Findlay R, Addison DS, Goiceanu C, Sienkiewicz Z. Early-Life Exposure to Pulsed LTE Radiofrequency Fields Causes Persistent Changes in Activity and Behavior in C57BL/6 J Mice. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;40(7):498-511. doi:10.1002/bem.22217
- Cabré-Riera et al. Association between estimated whole-brain radiofrequency electromagnetic fields dose and cognitive function in preadolescents and adolescents. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Jan;231:113659.
- Sharma S, Shukla S. Effect of electromagnetic radiation on redox status, acetylcholine esterase activity and cellular damage contributing to the diminution of the brain working memory in rats. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2020 Jul;106:101784
- Alkis ME, Bilgin HM, Akpolat V, Dasdag S, Yegin K, Yavas MC, Akdag MZ. Effect of 900-, 1800-, and 2100-MHz radiofrequency radiation on DNA and oxidative stress in brain. Electromagn Biol Med. 2019;38(1):32-47.
- Kesari KK, Agarwal A, Henkel R. Radiations and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Dec 9;16(1):118.
- Hagai Levine, Niels Jørgensen, Anderson Martino-Andrade, Jaime Mendiola, Dan Weksler-Derri, Irina Mindlis, Rachel Pinotti, Shanna H Swan, Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis, Human Reproduction Update, Volume 23, Issue 6, November-December 2017, Pages 646–659
- Spandidos Publications styleHardell L and Hardell L: Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicology and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and in mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz. Int J Oncol 54: 111-127, 2019
- World Health Organization – IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields.
- Miller AB, Morgan LL, Udasin I, Davis DL. Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102). Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:673-683
- Health impact of 5G – EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA) PE 690.012 – July 2021. Link to PDF
- Smith-Roe SL, Wyde ME, Stout MD, Winters JW, Hobbs CA, Shepard KG, Green AS, Kissling GE, Shockley KR, Tice RR, Bucher JR, Witt KL. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020 Feb;61(2):276-290.
- VERUM Foundation Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Energy Electromagnetic – Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods – Contract number: QLK4-CT-1999-01574
- Al-Serori H, Ferk F, Kundi M, Bileck A, Gerner C, Mišík M, Nersesyan A, Waldherr M, Murbach M, Lah TT, Herold-Mende C, Collins AR, Knasmüller S. Mobile phone specific electromagnetic fields induce transient DNA damage and nucleotide excision repair in serum-deprived human glioblastoma cells. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0193677.
- Al-Serori H, Ferk F, Kundi M, Bileck A, Gerner C, Mišík M, Nersesyan A, Waldherr M, Murbach M, Lah TT, Herold-Mende C, Collins AR, Knasmüller S. Mobile phone specific electromagnetic fields induce transient DNA damage and nucleotide excision repair in serum-deprived human glioblastoma cells. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0193677.
- Zothansiama, Zosangzuali M, Lalramdinpuii M, Jagetia GC. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromagn Biol Med. 2017;36(3):295-305.
- Wall S, Wang ZM, Kendig T, Dobraca D, Lipsett M. Real-world cell phone radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposures. Environ Res. 2019 Apr;171:581-592
- ICNIRP GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME‐VARYING ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS (1 HZ – 100 kHZ) PUBLISHED IN: HEALTH PHYSICS 99(6):818‐836; 2010. https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPLFgdl.pdf
- Federal Communications Commission – Cell Phones and Specific Absorption Rate. https://www.fcc.gov/general/cell-phones-and-specific-absorption-rate
